Talk:Downing effect

Is the label "Downing effect" actually used?

Is the phrase "Downing effect" actually used in psychological literature? If not, then the title of the article is original research, like Dunning-Kruger effect. I suggest this effect deserves mention in an article on IQ, and in an appropriate article on cognitive bias, rather than its own article.MartinPoulter (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Illusory Superiority?

Could the references be used in the article on Illusory superiority? Since there's no reference for legitimate use of the phrase "Downing effect" it looks like the article needs to be deleted, but the refs are useful. MartinPoulter (talk) 22:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand

At first it says that higher IQ holders tend to underestimate own IQ while lower IQ holders tend to overestimate it. Then, it says men tend to overestimate IQ while women tend to underestimate. Does it follow that women have high IQ and men have low? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.192.248.201 (talk) 09:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing

You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 20:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]